Logical properties of hotness
Jun. 22nd, 2011 12:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lightcastleI really wish I could remember my formal math and logic.
From a comment thread on an article about a bad sexual science study, this was proposed:
"Really, Really Hot" does not always equal "Awesome Sex", but "Awesome Sex" often equals "Really, Really Hot".
So the property is not transitive? Or is it not reflexive? Or am I completely misremembering and it simply is some sort of special case of affirming the consequent?
From a comment thread on an article about a bad sexual science study, this was proposed:
"Really, Really Hot" does not always equal "Awesome Sex", but "Awesome Sex" often equals "Really, Really Hot".
So the property is not transitive? Or is it not reflexive? Or am I completely misremembering and it simply is some sort of special case of affirming the consequent?
