SEO question [Ask the Interwebs]
Jan. 30th, 2011 09:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lightcastleA question arose in a discussion among friends a week or so ago and I just remembered to ask you people, since I know many of you deal with SEO. When working for Ictus, I had been told that a site that updates, and is not static, is weighted better for SEO, as something live. Thus having a news stream/blog/etc was better. I was recently told by a friend that she was told that was completely wrong and your front page should be static, because otherwise you are just thought of as new pages constantly and your SEO isn't optimal.
Out of curiousity, does anyone know if either of those is true? I recall SEO being full of people making guesses about what works and having all kinds of semi-mystical alchemy, so who knows that the state of the art is. (And for all I know, there is more than one perfectly acceptable method).
Out of curiousity, does anyone know if either of those is true? I recall SEO being full of people making guesses about what works and having all kinds of semi-mystical alchemy, so who knows that the state of the art is. (And for all I know, there is more than one perfectly acceptable method).
